I wrote this as part of a discussion on facebook today, and I thought maybe it'd be good to update this blog. It's been a while.
Philippians 2:10-11 (CEV)....everyone will bow down, those in heaven, on earth, and under the earth. And to the glory of God the Father everyone will openly agree, "Jesus Christ is Lord!"
Two pictures come to mind:
In one, Jesus is standing behind an unrepentant sinner. Jesus whacks him in the back of the knees with a 2x4, and says, "Take that! I tried to warn you, you wouldn't listen, and now you're gonna pay." Jesus beats the sinner to his knees, and He forces him to confess that He is God. Then, all his "Christian" friends and family, along with all the Saints, look on and cheer as he goes away into the "eternal" fire.
In another scene, Jesus is standing beside the unrepentant sinner, and says to him, "I tried to reach out you, and you wouldn't listen." The sinner, who didn't "believe in" Jesus in his lifetime, is now face-to-face with God and sees Jesus standing right next to him. He realizes that he has made a terrible mistake, and he will suffer the consequences of his sins. He is tossed into the darkness outside the gates of God's holy city. There he weeps. He wails. He blames everyone but himself. He is confronted with all the sins he has ever committed. He experiences the "hell" of being fully exposed to all the evil that has been perpetrated by mankind, and it is unbearable. He knows he is unworthy of entering the gates of Zion, yet he longs to drink from the River of Life. The pain of KNOWING is excruciating. At some point, he wishes that he had "believed" and falls to his knees in despair. On his knees, he begs for forgiveness. He calls out to Jesus and says, "Jesus, I know. I know you are Lord. I'm sorry I didn't believe you." And Jesus, having the keys to the "hell" the sinner is imprisoned in, says to him, "Come..."
Which picture fits the verses?
11.08.2011
9.11.2009
Are We Not Supposed to Believe Them?
Most of us have been taught by the dogma of our various religious denominations that if we don't repent and "accept Jesus" we're gonna burn in hell "for ever and ever." This belief wasn't always part of the doctrine of the church. If you look at The Apostles' Creed, the oldest documented formal statement of faith (the first and ORIGINAL doctrine of the church), eternal punishment/torment/damnation is not mentioned at all. Are we supposed to believe later doctrines written by religious organizations hundreds or, in some cases, thousands of years after the Apostles or the original?
All my life we've been told scriptures are the revealed word of God. When the prophet Jeremiah says, "For men are not cast off by the Lord forever" (Lamentations 3:31). Who are we to contradict him?
It's been said to us countless times that God's word is contained in The Bible. When the prophet Zephaniah proclaims that God Himself says, "Therefore wait for me," declares the LORD, "for the day I will stand up to testify. I have decided to assemble the nations,to gather the kingdoms and to pour out my wrath on them—all my fierce anger. The whole world will be consumed by the fire of my jealous anger." "Then will I purify the lips of the peoples, that all of them may call on the name of the LORD and serve him shoulder to shoulder" (Zephaniah 3:8-9). Who are we to say Zephaniah misquoted the Lord?
We've all heard that the Gospels contain the truth about Jesus. When John the Baptist says of Jesus, "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!" (John 1:29) who are we to call him a liar?
We're obligated as a Christians to accept Jesus as the way, the truth, and the life. When the Messiah says "Now is the time for judgment on this world; now the prince of this world will be driven out. But I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw (ἑλκύω which literally means "to drag") all men to myself." (John 12:32), who are we to say he cannot accomplish that task?
As gentile believers, we're supposed to look to the epistles of Paul of Tarsus for guidance in living a life pleasing to God. When Paul says, "This is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance (and for this we labor and strive), that we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all men, and especially of those who believe." (1 Timothy 4:9-10), who are we to say that all is anything less than ALL, and that especially REALLY means exclusively?
These are just a few of literally hundreds of scriptural and historical supports for what I believe to be the truth. These verses are by no means a complete catalogue of the scriptural "evidence" for the final restoration of all things.
All my life we've been told scriptures are the revealed word of God. When the prophet Jeremiah says, "For men are not cast off by the Lord forever" (Lamentations 3:31). Who are we to contradict him?
It's been said to us countless times that God's word is contained in The Bible. When the prophet Zephaniah proclaims that God Himself says, "Therefore wait for me," declares the LORD, "for the day I will stand up to testify. I have decided to assemble the nations,to gather the kingdoms and to pour out my wrath on them—all my fierce anger. The whole world will be consumed by the fire of my jealous anger." "Then will I purify the lips of the peoples, that all of them may call on the name of the LORD and serve him shoulder to shoulder" (Zephaniah 3:8-9). Who are we to say Zephaniah misquoted the Lord?
We've all heard that the Gospels contain the truth about Jesus. When John the Baptist says of Jesus, "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!" (John 1:29) who are we to call him a liar?
We're obligated as a Christians to accept Jesus as the way, the truth, and the life. When the Messiah says "Now is the time for judgment on this world; now the prince of this world will be driven out. But I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw (ἑλκύω which literally means "to drag") all men to myself." (John 12:32), who are we to say he cannot accomplish that task?
As gentile believers, we're supposed to look to the epistles of Paul of Tarsus for guidance in living a life pleasing to God. When Paul says, "This is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance (and for this we labor and strive), that we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all men, and especially of those who believe." (1 Timothy 4:9-10), who are we to say that all is anything less than ALL, and that especially REALLY means exclusively?
These are just a few of literally hundreds of scriptural and historical supports for what I believe to be the truth. These verses are by no means a complete catalogue of the scriptural "evidence" for the final restoration of all things.
8.04.2009
What the Hell was Peter Talking about?
In a previous article I stated that Moses and the apostle Simon (Peter) never warned about eternal damnation as God's solution for dealing with unrepentant sinners. As an end note to that post I mentioned that 2 Peter 2:4 contains a word that is translated as "hell" in English. This article will, hopefully, offer a little insight that passage, and perhaps a clearer picture of meaning of the words it contains. At face value, the passage seems to support the traditional dogma of eternal damnation; however, a closer look may prove otherwise. While there has been considerable debate over the last 2000 years whether Peter actually wrote this epistle, for the purpose of this article I will assume the authorship is genuine.
The Greek word, ταρταρώσας (tartarōsas), in 2 Peter 2:4 only occurs once in the entire Bible. In many Bible versions it is translated as "cast them into hell." What most people don't know is that the place this passage refers to comes directly from classical Greek mythology. Tartarus, or Τάρταρος, is where the Greek god Zeus imprisoned the Titans after he defeated them in the Titan War. By using this word, is Peter telling us that God is actually the pagan god Zeus and/or that the Tartarus of Greek mythology is his prison? Would the Christians of Peter's time have tolerated the blending of the one, true God with elements of a pagan religion and its myths? One would certainly hope that is not the case!
How can the inclusion of this Greek word in scripture be explained, then? Perhaps Peter borrowed the word (and concept?) from Greek mythology, and he uses it in order to influence recent pagan converts and Hellenistic Jews. Perhaps it was added to the original writing at a later date. Unfortunately, there is no way to know why the word was used, so we must examine how this obscure reference to Greek mythology is used. In 2 Peter 2:4, Tartarus is used not in the form of a proper noun, but in the form of a verb. As such, the passage does not describe a physical place, but an ACTION. A more literal translation of the passage would be: For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but is tartarusing them in pits of darkness, reserved for judgment;. Bottom line: God isn't Zeus, and God isn't borrowing Zeus's jail to hold fallen angels.
The Greek word, ταρταρώσας (tartarōsas), in 2 Peter 2:4 only occurs once in the entire Bible. In many Bible versions it is translated as "cast them into hell." What most people don't know is that the place this passage refers to comes directly from classical Greek mythology. Tartarus, or Τάρταρος, is where the Greek god Zeus imprisoned the Titans after he defeated them in the Titan War. By using this word, is Peter telling us that God is actually the pagan god Zeus and/or that the Tartarus of Greek mythology is his prison? Would the Christians of Peter's time have tolerated the blending of the one, true God with elements of a pagan religion and its myths? One would certainly hope that is not the case!
How can the inclusion of this Greek word in scripture be explained, then? Perhaps Peter borrowed the word (and concept?) from Greek mythology, and he uses it in order to influence recent pagan converts and Hellenistic Jews. Perhaps it was added to the original writing at a later date. Unfortunately, there is no way to know why the word was used, so we must examine how this obscure reference to Greek mythology is used. In 2 Peter 2:4, Tartarus is used not in the form of a proper noun, but in the form of a verb. As such, the passage does not describe a physical place, but an ACTION. A more literal translation of the passage would be: For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but is tartarusing them in pits of darkness, reserved for judgment;. Bottom line: God isn't Zeus, and God isn't borrowing Zeus's jail to hold fallen angels.
Not every translation uses the words"cast them into hell" for ταρταρώσας. The Darby Translation, and others, do not. Ultimately, alternative translations and speculation about Peter's reasoning doesn't really provide much ammunition to shoot down the traditionalists' dogma, but it does provide some framework for the word. It also supports the argument that maybe "cast them into hell" has been intentionally used by some Bible translators to prop up the doctrine of eternal damnation. Regardless of the translation, looking at the context of the verse conclusively proves that the place these fallen messengers (and the others mentioned in the text) are held is temporary.
Take a look at Peter 2:4-9 in the New Living Translation:
4 For God did not spare even the angels who sinned. He threw them into hell, in gloomy pits of darkness, where they are being held until the day of judgment. 5 And God did not spare the ancient world—except for Noah and the seven others in his family. Noah warned the world of God’s righteous judgment. So God protected Noah when he destroyed the world of ungodly people with a vast flood. 6 Later, God condemned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah and turned them into heaps of ashes. He made them an example of what will happen to ungodly people. 7 But God also rescued Lot out of Sodom because he was a righteous man who was sick of the shameful immorality of the wicked people around him. 8 Yes, Lot was a righteous man who was tormented in his soul by the wickedness he saw and heard day after day. 9 So you see, the Lord knows how to rescue godly people from their trials, even while keeping the wicked under punishment until the day of final judgment.
Regardless of which version you look to, they all conclusively state that in 2 Peter 2:9 that the fallen angels and the ungodly are imprisoned until the day of judgement. This is important to note, because it does NOT say that the fallen angels and the ungodly people are imprisoned for eternity (a word that doesn't have a Hebrew or Greek equivalent). It also does not say that ANY humans were imprisoned in Tartarus. On the contrary, verse 6 says God "turned them into heaps of ashes". This passage provide stronger support for annihilationism than it does do for an eternal damnation "end times" scenario.
Nowhere in any part of the speeches or writings of Peter, the person Jesus put in charge of His church, is there any mention of God punishing sinners forever. If casting off men forever (oops!) into a gloomy pit or a lake of fire was part of God's final plan, then wouldn't it stand to reason that Peter would have warned us?
6.22.2009
It's "Official": I'm a Heretic
As most of you reading this know, I often post my thoughts about a piece of scripture in my facebook profile. Typically, this elicits a few comments and hopefully makes my Christian friends and my non-Christian friends think about how they view themselves and God. Last week, I had some new "friends" (who shall remain nameless) who apparently know the mind of God so well that they appointed themselves as my judges, convened a jury of consisting of themselves, and "tested the spirit (me) and found him not to be of God." Not only did they accuse me of heresy in my private profile (where they were invited guests), they also made their accusations on another website, and have repeatedly dragged me through the dirt BY NAME.
"Christians" like them are the reason there are so many people who do not believe in God. I became an atheist when I was a teenager because of people just like them, so I'm 100% confident in making that statement. Hateful, judgmental people whose "gospel" consists of messages of hate and judgment give Jesus a bad name. Every day they rob people of hope, and steal God's love away from those who probably need it the most. Imagine how Jesus feels when the "gospel" that gets preached AT people is one of God's hatred of sinners, wrath for those who do not repent, and eternal torment and casting off of those who do not obey.
"Christians" like them are the reason there are so many people who do not believe in God. I became an atheist when I was a teenager because of people just like them, so I'm 100% confident in making that statement. Hateful, judgmental people whose "gospel" consists of messages of hate and judgment give Jesus a bad name. Every day they rob people of hope, and steal God's love away from those who probably need it the most. Imagine how Jesus feels when the "gospel" that gets preached AT people is one of God's hatred of sinners, wrath for those who do not repent, and eternal torment and casting off of those who do not obey.
Fortunately, small-minded haters like them don't scare me any more.
Who's Taking YOU to Court?
There are literally HUNDREDS of little nuggets of scripture that are shining examples of God's wonderful, unlimited offer of reconciliation through His son and Messiah Jesus of Nazareth. The Bible has many courtroom references and metaphors. Obviously, when you speak of a coming judgment of mankind according to God's Law you would expect to find some scriptures about courts.
Take a look at Job 4:17, which says,"'Can a mortal be more righteous than God? Can a man be more pure than his Maker?" Ask those questions and apply them to our earthly sytems of justice and courtrooms. The harshest form of punishment man has applied to crimes is death. Are our courts more righteous than God's? Is the justice of our courts more pure than that of God's justice? Are our judgments more righteous than God's?
Of all the references to judgment and courts in the Bible, there are two similar verses that the traditionalists' (trying to avoid using the word Hellburner, but it's really hard) interpretation has said only apply to civil matters between "brothers". Most will say that these verses only apply to OUR courts, not GOD'S. Go pick up your Bible (or click the link) and read Matthew 5:25-26 and Luke 12:57-59. These scriptures are a reference to our coming judgment, and the need to seek reconciliation NOW, in this lifetime, so that we do not end up going to the prison of Gehenna (hell).
The Greek word translated as "adversary" in Matthew 5:25 is ἀντίδικος. The identical Greek word occurs in only one other place in scripture. In 1 Peter 5:8 ἀντίδικος is translated as "enemy" in the NIV to avoid contradicting the doctrine of eternal damnation, but it plainly states that the ἀντίδικος is "the devil". In Hebrew the word השָׂטָן (satan) has a literal meaning of "adversary" or "accuser". In the context of these scriptures, the satan is your accuser. He is the adversary you will face in God's court. In these scriptures there is no mention of a "life sentence" in Hell.
Jesus used stories and parables to relate truths about God. They were more than just simple stories with obvious meanings, otherwise the Apostles would have easily understood them every time Jesus told them. Many times there were deeper truths that you could peel away and apply to God's kingdom. Often these truths are hidden from men by their desire to follow the rules. When men are more intent on following the rules than following the ruler, they become like the Pharisees in Jesus's time. They become blind to the obvious, and sometimes try to bend the truth to make it fit their rules.
Ask yourself those questions from Job again-if they are untrue about God's judgment of us, then that makes US more righteous than God. Apply those questions to God's court, He is the magistrate. You are the accused. Your adversary, the devil, is taking you to God's court. Do you want to go to prison (Sheol, Hades Gehanna, Tartarus, or the Lake of Fire, whatever place you want to call "hell")? Or do you want the Chief Officer of God's court, Jesus, to take up your case before God and win you a pardon for your crimes? These scriptures are a warning. Be reconciled in this lifetime!
Notice that in both scriptures contain a second part. In them, Jesus says, "I tell you the truth, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny." Is Jesus telling the truth, or will God sentence some people to be "tormented day and night for ever and ever" as punishment for their crimes? Why would Jesus say that those in "prison" can be released if they can't? Jesus has already paid the price for the crimes of the world and has the keys to the jail. Jesus didn't come to bring a "life sentence" to a "second death" for those that chose to ignore His warnings. He came to offer us a pardon for our crimes and cancel the debt we owe to God. He can do that in this lifetime, or for those who do not heed the warnings and repent along the way, while they are in prison. The offer is always there, but the value of accepting it in THIS lifetime allows us start living our "life sentence" now.
Take a look at Job 4:17, which says,"'Can a mortal be more righteous than God? Can a man be more pure than his Maker?" Ask those questions and apply them to our earthly sytems of justice and courtrooms. The harshest form of punishment man has applied to crimes is death. Are our courts more righteous than God's? Is the justice of our courts more pure than that of God's justice? Are our judgments more righteous than God's?
Of all the references to judgment and courts in the Bible, there are two similar verses that the traditionalists' (trying to avoid using the word Hellburner, but it's really hard) interpretation has said only apply to civil matters between "brothers". Most will say that these verses only apply to OUR courts, not GOD'S. Go pick up your Bible (or click the link) and read Matthew 5:25-26 and Luke 12:57-59. These scriptures are a reference to our coming judgment, and the need to seek reconciliation NOW, in this lifetime, so that we do not end up going to the prison of Gehenna (hell).
The Greek word translated as "adversary" in Matthew 5:25 is ἀντίδικος. The identical Greek word occurs in only one other place in scripture. In 1 Peter 5:8 ἀντίδικος is translated as "enemy" in the NIV to avoid contradicting the doctrine of eternal damnation, but it plainly states that the ἀντίδικος is "the devil". In Hebrew the word השָׂטָן (satan) has a literal meaning of "adversary" or "accuser". In the context of these scriptures, the satan is your accuser. He is the adversary you will face in God's court. In these scriptures there is no mention of a "life sentence" in Hell.
Jesus used stories and parables to relate truths about God. They were more than just simple stories with obvious meanings, otherwise the Apostles would have easily understood them every time Jesus told them. Many times there were deeper truths that you could peel away and apply to God's kingdom. Often these truths are hidden from men by their desire to follow the rules. When men are more intent on following the rules than following the ruler, they become like the Pharisees in Jesus's time. They become blind to the obvious, and sometimes try to bend the truth to make it fit their rules.
Ask yourself those questions from Job again-if they are untrue about God's judgment of us, then that makes US more righteous than God. Apply those questions to God's court, He is the magistrate. You are the accused. Your adversary, the devil, is taking you to God's court. Do you want to go to prison (Sheol, Hades Gehanna, Tartarus, or the Lake of Fire, whatever place you want to call "hell")? Or do you want the Chief Officer of God's court, Jesus, to take up your case before God and win you a pardon for your crimes? These scriptures are a warning. Be reconciled in this lifetime!
Notice that in both scriptures contain a second part. In them, Jesus says, "I tell you the truth, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny." Is Jesus telling the truth, or will God sentence some people to be "tormented day and night for ever and ever" as punishment for their crimes? Why would Jesus say that those in "prison" can be released if they can't? Jesus has already paid the price for the crimes of the world and has the keys to the jail. Jesus didn't come to bring a "life sentence" to a "second death" for those that chose to ignore His warnings. He came to offer us a pardon for our crimes and cancel the debt we owe to God. He can do that in this lifetime, or for those who do not heed the warnings and repent along the way, while they are in prison. The offer is always there, but the value of accepting it in THIS lifetime allows us start living our "life sentence" now.
6.13.2009
A Few Simple Reasons
Sorry for the lack of updates. Having a concussion is slowing down the writing a little. Thought I'd post what I think are a few of the effects of the modern denominational church dogma about "eternal damnation":
- Maligns God's character before the world.
- Contradicts His unending and unfailing love for all people.
- Makes our worship stem from fear instead of true affection.
- Denies His unlimited power to accomplish His will.
- Makes man's will greater than God's will.
- Infinitely minimizes Christ's triumph over sin and death.
- Denies Christ fully accomplished His mission on earth.
- Violates the divine witness revealed in every conscience.
- Negates the most glorious promises in the Bible.
- Ignores the testimony of the early Church.
- Robs us of peace and joy.
- Affects what we become; - like Father like son.
- Hinders world evangelism.
5.31.2009
Jesus the Carpenter?
I visited my former church today, and the sermon was a really good one. The message started with a monologue with the speaker playing a poker game and talking to Jesus, who happened to show up and suggest a different game-one in which the poker player was forced to go "all in" to match Jesus's bet. Later in the message the speaker was relating the story of Jesus's calling of the first disciples in Luke 5:1-11 , and how Simon (Peter) went "all in" and left a huge catch of fish, his nets, his boat, and his family to follow Jesus.
I won't go through every little detail, but the speaker speculated that the reason Simon made the commitment to leave everything behind to follow Jesus was that he was amazed that this carpenter, "a guy who probably never wet a hook," (the speaker is an avid outdoorsman) could direct him to a spot where Simon Peter and his partners were able to fill two boats with fish after they (the professional, expert fishermen) had caught nothing the night before.
The speaker did a masterful job of creating a story which demonstrated the commitment, not only of Jesus, but also of the disciples. It demonstrated the need for us, in modern times, to commit ourselves to God's purpose for our lives and go "all in" as well. If by chance he reads this, I want to express that I think this sermon was the best I have ever heard him preach. I enjoyed it very much.
I was thinking during this sermon...which often seems to lead me to alternatives to the traditions we are taught in church. I've actually had this thought before, but the sermon today seemed to bring it to the forefront of my mind. Jesus WASN'T a just a simple carpenter. The mention of Jesus as a carpenter occurs only in Mark 6:3. In Matthew 13:55 Jesus is described as "the carpenter's son." At first these passages seem like clear and convincing evidence of Jesus's trade (if you don't consider that we read our Bibles in English instead of Greek).
However, when we look at Mark 6:3 in the original language the evidence is a little less convincing. In Greek the word translated as "carpenter," is τέκτων (tektōn). As is often the case, something is lost is the translation. As is also the case in The Bible, passages frequently have multiple levels and layers of meaning in the original language that are not apparent at first glance, especially after they have been translated into English. A τέκτων could be a carpenter, but the word's literal meaning, craftsman, denotes someone with a mastery of their trade; it also opens up a whole host of vocations in which Jesus might have been employed.
Jesus might have been a carpenter, but the likelihood that He was a carpenter of the sort you and I are familiar with is very slim. Ever seen a picture of Israel? Not a lot of trees there. Based on that fact alone I'd say "carpenter" wasn't the most likely trade for Jesus. Most buildings in Jesus's time were stone. If you use Google's translation program a τέκτων is a "mason." Perhaps Jesus was a stone mason. The words αρχι (initial, or primary) + τέκτων (builder, craftsman) make up the Greek word for architect, αρχιτέκτων. Perhaps Jesus was an architect. I have my own personal theory about what Jesus did, but no way to "prove" what I believe His trade actually was. Someday I'll write a blog post about it (or you can just ask me next time you see me). I will say this-it involves woodworking.
Whatever Jesus's trade might have been, the dogma of the modern church and the teaching of men serves, once again, to impose a limit on Him if it is assumed to be "fact" without further study. Just because your Bible says Jesus was a "carpenter" in one verse of The Bible doesn't mean he sawed wood and hammered nails. Jesus is referred to as "Rabbi" (in Greek ῥαββί) thirteen times, and "Teacher" (διδασκαλον) forty-two times in the Gospels. Both words hold similar meanings in Greek-one of an "expert" instructor. A more accurate parallel in modern times would be that of a professor with a Ph.D. or Jewish Rabbi. If scripture is our guide, obviously there is clearly enough reference material to say without doubt that Jesus was a "master teacher."
Whether or not Jesus was a carpenter probably isn't really important (only He knows for sure). What IS important is that we take a diligent look at what we are taught as "truth" and "fact." Scripture specifically warns us in 2 Peter 2:1 to be mindful of false teaching. Obviously, it's not likely that any great conspiracy or heresy results from the traditional dogma of Jesus the carpenter; however, blindly accepting everything we are taught as "truth" or "fact" without exploring other possibilities CAN lead to our falling into a pit (see Luke 6:39-40).
Our Master, Our Rabbi, and our Teacher is Jesus. Follow him. You can lay all your chips on the table and make an "all in" bet on His teaching and you won't fall into any pits, guaranteed. He is the "fact" and the "truth" you can rely on.
I won't go through every little detail, but the speaker speculated that the reason Simon made the commitment to leave everything behind to follow Jesus was that he was amazed that this carpenter, "a guy who probably never wet a hook," (the speaker is an avid outdoorsman) could direct him to a spot where Simon Peter and his partners were able to fill two boats with fish after they (the professional, expert fishermen) had caught nothing the night before.
The speaker did a masterful job of creating a story which demonstrated the commitment, not only of Jesus, but also of the disciples. It demonstrated the need for us, in modern times, to commit ourselves to God's purpose for our lives and go "all in" as well. If by chance he reads this, I want to express that I think this sermon was the best I have ever heard him preach. I enjoyed it very much.
I was thinking during this sermon...which often seems to lead me to alternatives to the traditions we are taught in church. I've actually had this thought before, but the sermon today seemed to bring it to the forefront of my mind. Jesus WASN'T a just a simple carpenter. The mention of Jesus as a carpenter occurs only in Mark 6:3. In Matthew 13:55 Jesus is described as "the carpenter's son." At first these passages seem like clear and convincing evidence of Jesus's trade (if you don't consider that we read our Bibles in English instead of Greek).
However, when we look at Mark 6:3 in the original language the evidence is a little less convincing. In Greek the word translated as "carpenter," is τέκτων (tektōn). As is often the case, something is lost is the translation. As is also the case in The Bible, passages frequently have multiple levels and layers of meaning in the original language that are not apparent at first glance, especially after they have been translated into English. A τέκτων could be a carpenter, but the word's literal meaning, craftsman, denotes someone with a mastery of their trade; it also opens up a whole host of vocations in which Jesus might have been employed.
Jesus might have been a carpenter, but the likelihood that He was a carpenter of the sort you and I are familiar with is very slim. Ever seen a picture of Israel? Not a lot of trees there. Based on that fact alone I'd say "carpenter" wasn't the most likely trade for Jesus. Most buildings in Jesus's time were stone. If you use Google's translation program a τέκτων is a "mason." Perhaps Jesus was a stone mason. The words αρχι (initial, or primary) + τέκτων (builder, craftsman) make up the Greek word for architect, αρχιτέκτων. Perhaps Jesus was an architect. I have my own personal theory about what Jesus did, but no way to "prove" what I believe His trade actually was. Someday I'll write a blog post about it (or you can just ask me next time you see me). I will say this-it involves woodworking.
Whatever Jesus's trade might have been, the dogma of the modern church and the teaching of men serves, once again, to impose a limit on Him if it is assumed to be "fact" without further study. Just because your Bible says Jesus was a "carpenter" in one verse of The Bible doesn't mean he sawed wood and hammered nails. Jesus is referred to as "Rabbi" (in Greek ῥαββί) thirteen times, and "Teacher" (διδασκαλον) forty-two times in the Gospels. Both words hold similar meanings in Greek-one of an "expert" instructor. A more accurate parallel in modern times would be that of a professor with a Ph.D. or Jewish Rabbi. If scripture is our guide, obviously there is clearly enough reference material to say without doubt that Jesus was a "master teacher."
Whether or not Jesus was a carpenter probably isn't really important (only He knows for sure). What IS important is that we take a diligent look at what we are taught as "truth" and "fact." Scripture specifically warns us in 2 Peter 2:1 to be mindful of false teaching. Obviously, it's not likely that any great conspiracy or heresy results from the traditional dogma of Jesus the carpenter; however, blindly accepting everything we are taught as "truth" or "fact" without exploring other possibilities CAN lead to our falling into a pit (see Luke 6:39-40).
Our Master, Our Rabbi, and our Teacher is Jesus. Follow him. You can lay all your chips on the table and make an "all in" bet on His teaching and you won't fall into any pits, guaranteed. He is the "fact" and the "truth" you can rely on.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
